Hate Speeches: As It Seems The Specific Elements Deployed For The Hate Speeches Against Muslims And Other Minorities To Divide Politically My India
By: Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhianahttps://www.ndtv.com/india-
reached-in-the-
· "Act Or Face Contempt": Supreme Court To Government On Hate Speech: "Act Or Face Contempt":
Supreme Court To Government On Hate Speech: https://www.ndtv.com/india-
hate-
more far reaching in its impact as a result of the support, directly or indirectly, extended to radical
miscreants, who engage in acts of hate crimes, physical violence as well as communally charged
speeches by the ruling political party", it said”. The Telegraph Online
· Hate Speeches: As It Seems The Specific Elements Deployed For The Hate Speeches Against Muslims
And Other Minorities To Divide Politically My India
· “Not Wrong To Take UP Arms To Protect Hindus': VHP Backs Surendra Jain's Comment Against
Muslims”Behind Lawyers-Gangsters Nexus: “The legal professionals are not aware of the constitutional
rights and duties and the constitutional principles” CJI NV Ramana said” By: Balbir Singh Sooch,
Advocate, Ludhiana
https://www.facebook.com/
rights and duties and the constitutional principles” CJI NV Ramana said”
https://www.facebook.com/
What About Other Corrupts In Our Indian System? By Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
http://www.thekhalsa.org/
Supreme Court To Government On Hate Speech: The court was hearing a petition that called for an
urgent intervention to stop hate speeches against the Muslim community. NDTV News Desk:Updated:
October 21, 2022 5:32 pm IST: https://www.ndtv.com/india-
this-is-21st-century-
New Delhi: Two days after United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres criticised India over its
human rights record and growing hate speeches during a three-day visit, the Supreme Court on Friday
made some of its strongest comments yet on the subject.
"This is the 21st century. Where have we reached in the name of religion?" the court said, hearing a
petition on hate speeches and directing authorities to act against such instances by themselves
or face contempt charges. "Contempt will be initiated if the authorities fail to act," the court said.
It said the state of affairs in India was "shocking for a country that is supposed to be religion-neutral".
On Thursday, the Supreme Court had sought responses from the centre and the states to a plea
requesting an urgent intervention to stop the "growing menace of targeting and terrorising (of) the
Muslim Community in India".
Petitioner Shaheen Abdullah had asked the top court to direct the centre and states to initiate credible
probes into the incidents of hate crimes and hate speeches across the country.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, presented a recent "Hindu Sabha" as an
example where BJP MP from West Delhi, Parvesh Verma, called for the "total boycott" of "these
people" in a hard-to-miss reference to Muslims.
The judges also read comments by another speaker at the event, Jagat Guru Yogeshwar Acharya, who
urged attendees to "slit the throats" of anyone who "raises a finger at our temples".
Thanked by Mr Sibal for their stern order to the police and governments to file cases on their own, the
judges said, "It's our duty... if we don't do it, it's abdication on our side."
In his petition, Mr Abdullah has also sought invoking the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and
other stringent provisions to curb hate crimes and hate speeches.
He said the Muslim community is being "targeted and terrorised" by the participation of the members
of the ruling political party in delivering the hate speeches.
The hearing came two days after United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres red-flagged
growing hate speeches in the country in a rare rebuke.
"As an elected member of the Human Rights Council, India has a responsibility to shape global human
rights, and to protect and promote the rights of all individuals, including members of minority
communities," Mr Guterres said in a speech in Mumbai.
Though he praised India's achievements 75 years after leaving British rule, Mr Guterres also said
that the understanding that "diversity is a richness... is not a guarantee".
Citing Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, Mr Guterres said their values need to be guarded by
"condemning hate speech unequivocally".
India must do this "by protecting the rights and freedoms of journalists, human rights activists,
students and academics. And by ensuring the continued independence of India's judiciary", he said,
adding that "much more needs to be done to advance gender equality and women's rights".
'Not Wrong To Take UP Arms To Protect Hindus': VHP Backs Surendra Jain's Comment Against Muslims
"The spread of hate towards Muslims and other minorities gets accelerated and becomes all the more far-
reaching in its impact as a result of the support, directly or indirectly, extended to radical miscreants,
who engage in acts of hate crimes, physical violence as well as communally charged speeches by the
ruling political party," the petition said, NDTV quoted”.TIMESNOW
"The spread of hate towards Muslims and other minorities gets accelerated and becomes all the more
far reaching in its impact as a result of the support, directly or indirectly, extended to radical
miscreants, who engage in acts of hate crimes, physical violence as well as communally charged
speeches by the ruling political party", it said”. The Telegraph Online
"Where Have We Reached In The Name Of Religion? Article 51A Speaks Of Scientific Temper" :
Supreme Court On Hate Speeches Rintu Mariam Biju 21 Oct 202: Live Law
https://www.facebook.com/
What About Other Corrupts In Our Indian System? By Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
http://www.thekhalsa.org/
we-reached-in-the-
The Hate Speeches Against Muslims And Other Minorities To
Divide Politically My India