ਕੈਟੇਗਰੀ

ਤੁਹਾਡੀ ਰਾਇ



ਸਿੱਖ ਮਸਲੇ
More about Constitution of India and the Sikhs
More about Constitution of India and the Sikhs
Page Visitors: 2508

   Subject:  RE; More about Constitution of India and the Sikhs     From: “Arwinder Pal Singh ”  ranasoo1@hotmail.com
      Date:  Sat, November 30, 2013 5:34 am
         To: “Nanak Singh Nishter” <nanaknishter84@gmail.com >(more)
         Cc: “tengrg@gmail.com

    Dear Nashatar Singh Jee
Your paper seems to be a good effort however I am of the view that it is based on wrong 
information which is result of "Intellectual Suppression of Sikhs" and the main mechanism
 is that "Universities of East Punjab - The Organised Instrument of Our Intellectual 
Destruction".
"This is a case of naked interference in the religious affairs of the Sikhs with the 
intention to annihilate Sikhism.  This is a clear case of bankruptcy of Indian 
secularism". 
 Your observation is wrong. India is the best Secular country in the world. You need to
 understand the Philosophy and History behind Secularism. Secularism Does not mean 
Respect for all religions. But Secularism means that all religions must be demolished to
 form a single monolithic totalitarian state. 
For last 7000 years that's whats secularism has meant. Indira, Nehru, Gandhi were not 
the first seculars Indian Sub-Continent has. Before them we had Lakhpat Rai, Gangu, 
Chandu, Sheikh Ahmed Sirhadi.
The single mission that united Sheikh Ahmed Sirhadi's Students like Zakariya Khan and 
Farkuseyar with Lakhpat Rai was their common aim to Secularise Indian Sub-Continent 
under the central authority of 'Secualrism Being Coordinated in Arabic and Islamic 
Clothes' after the Death of Akbar and the main centre of this movement was Sheikh 
Sirhadi. . But principle was same. In modern History this task was handed over to Gandhi.
Also with respect to the constitution and legal jurisprudence I would request to atleast
check the history of Democracy. Democracy is not Government of the People For the people
 and by the people but is actually destruction of this very basic principle. 
 Did Baba Banda Singh Bahadur asked people to vote to decide how he should run the 
affairs of the Sirhind ?? 
Was Mob Rule instituted in Sirhind  ? 
Was it the Government of Principles ?
You can post counter questions:
Regards
Arwinder Singh
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
 Subject: More about Constitution of India and the Sikhs
  Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 05:02:04 +0530
   From: nanaknishter84@gmail.com
     To: pakhar@hotmail.com  and others
My dear bhai Harbans Singh ji,
Wahguru ji ka Khalsa    Wahguru ji ki fateh
Thanks for sending a nice writeup on a important subject.
I am sending my paper on this subject presented in a National Workshop organised by the
 NALSAR Law University, for your perusal.
With regards,
Sevadar,Nanak Singh Nishter
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Harbans Singh <pakhar@hotmail.com> 
On 27 November 2013 18:30, 
wrote:
 to,
      ss ahluwalia bjp ex mp
      tengrg@gmail.com
 it is fine and dandy on piece of paper.
in reality this constitution of india which was rejected by the Sikhs repsentative in 
1949.
Reason because she denied the Sikhs,jainas and Buddhist freedom of religious choice.
devilish architect of this constitution under article 25 section. 2.  inserted clause[b]
 explanation 2 it gobbled  up,assimilate these three independent religion of India as 
part and parcel of hindu religion.this constitution of india under this section are 
forcing these people to live under hindu references under hindu family laws.
please read clause [b] ''''''''all classes and sections of hindus.
explanation 2= in sub clause[b] section 2 the reference to hindus shall be construred as
 including a reference to person professing the   Sikh,jainas or Buddhist religion. 
this is total fascism forcing hindu references hindu family laws on these peoples why 
not on muslims,parsi and christians.
copy of this was burnt in 1984 by the cm of Punjab mr badal.
constitution review commission in year 2002 said mischief was done intentionally in 
clause[b] explanation 2 which denied independent status to these three religion of india.
commission recommended to reword clause[b] and delete explanation 2 www.lawmin.nic.in/
ncrwc.finalreport.htm
 11 years has gone by it seems to us india gov don't give a shit to amend this. hindu 
rashtar india gov secular credentials are in the dust bin.so please sto shouting this BS.
           H singh
©2012 & Designed by: Real Virtual Technologies
Disclaimer: thekhalsa.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the news / articles / audios / videos or any other contents published on www.thekhalsa.org and cannot be held responsible for their views.