ਬਲਬੀਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਸੂਚ (ਵਕੀਲ)
Is Ranjan Gogoi Childishly Overestimating Himself as the Judiciary after Becoming Rajya Sabha Member?
Page Visitors: 2456
Is Ranjan Gogoi Childishly Overestimating Himself as the Judiciary after Becoming Rajya Sabha Member?
By: Balbir Singh Sooch
https://www.facebook.com/
Observed By: Balbir Singh Sooch
http://www.thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=356&article=22884
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/2805214359513649
Is Ranjan Gogoi Childishly Overestimating Himself as the Judiciary after Becoming Rajya Sabha Member?
By: Balbir Singh Sooch
“Is Ranjan Gogoi suspect or Childishly Overestimating-‘having excessive merit’ Himself?
Or
Shall Former CJI Ranjan Gogoi be controlling indirectly judiciary like the Super Armed Forces Chief directly at the instance of executive headed by Prime Minister of India”. You silly, Balbir Singh Sooch can’t understand all this. Isn’t?
Whether Ranjan Gogoi not Childishly said, “When Ranjan Gogoi said that he had accepted his Rajya Sabha nomination to ensure that the judiciary and legislature work together for the task of nation-building, it resurfaced?. Felt like telling Ranjan Gogoi that he must remember that he does not belong to the judiciary anymore. He would soon be part of the ruling political class”. Learned Apoorvanand, Professor, Delhi University: https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/claim-of-nation-building-by-the-elite-is-suspect-58899
Once inspiring from Justice Ranjan Gogoi’s courage, wrote an article, ‘Needs Good-Bye to Ethics When Democracy at Stake-Risk in India’:
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=A16299_0_1_0_M
And
Therein in the article, ‘Needs Good-Bye to Ethics When Democracy at Stake-Risk in India’ projected also the pitiable conditions of downtrodden and the dark India under the head, ‘POVERTY IN INDIA’:
who has to now remain in ‘lockdown- PM’s Janata Curfew’: Read:
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=19095_0_1_0_C
To answer the question, ‘Is Ranjan Gogoi suspect or Childishly Overestimating-‘having excessive merit’ Himself’?’ and now the title of that article with different contents, as Learned Apoorvanand, Professor, Delhi University, intelligently contained-endorsed in his article, ‘Claim of nation-building by the elite is suspect’ published On March 21, 2020 06:29 AM (IST): By: The Tribune, Chandigarh, has to be, “‘Needs Good-Bye to Ethics When His Own (Ranjan Gogoi or any Justice) at Stake-Risk in India’
“In the last few years, the dialogue between the two (PM-executive and Judiciary) kept returning on several occasions. One was when the newly enthroned Prime Minister was speaking at a conference of the chief ministers and the chief justices of all high courts. At that conference, PM Modi said the judiciary should be cautious about delivering perception-driven verdicts, especially when perceptions were sourced from ‘five-star activists’.
A response, courteous-polite, considerate and yet with candour, was what was expected from the justices. But we were too naïve-immature to nurture-cultivate such hope.
The scene from the film Spotlight came back when the Supreme Court threw open Court No. 1 for the Prime Minister. Gogoi had just taken the chair of the CJI. No Prime Minister had expressed such a desire, so there was no precedent of a response to such a request. Many from the legal community had expressed their uneasiness even then.
It was Gogoi who championed the idea of the NRC with a zeal which was hard to explain. He declared the NRC to be the base of the future of India. Even when he was in chair he declared, ‘NRC, as it will finally emerge, is not a document of the moment — 19 lakhs or 40 lakhs is not the point. It is a base document for the future — kind of a reference document to determine future claims.’
It had become very clear that the court under Gogoi had decided to be the troubleshooter for the executive. But we should not forget that Gogoi was not alone, when one by one all this was being done. And what he did continues.
Habeas corpus petitions are gathering dust in the registry since August last year. The court overturned the bail given to 21 ‘anti-CAA protesters’ given by the Karnataka High Court, disregarding its observation that the police had not given conclusive evidence of their presence at the protest site and had ordered FIRs against the police officers instead.
The most recent instance is the reluctance of the Supreme Court to defend the order of the Allahabad High Court, in which it had asked the UP government to remove the banners carrying the names and photographs of the anti-CAA protesters”. Extracts from: ‘Claim of nation-building by the elite is suspect’ published On March 21, 2020 06:29 AM (IST): By: The Tribune, Chandigarh.
Author of this note used to appreciate then the Supreme Court judge Justice Ranjan Gogoi: Now Justice Ranjan Gogoi may be slave of the circumstance due to his own personal reasons? Can’t say?
(i) “Need Revolution, Not Reform": Supreme Court judge Justice Ranjan Gogoi said: http://www.thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=356&article=17565
(ii) Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi’s Thoroughness with Case Files and Does Not Allow Advocates to Weave Stories in Their Arguments: TOI: https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/1892981494070278
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/1892981494070278
Added Being Relevant in the Context: Thanks
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/2804846842883734
Will ‘Nirbhaya Has Got Justice’ also be a New Dawn-Light of New Era for Daughters of India?
http://www.thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=356&article=22878
Will ‘Nirbhaya Has Got Justice’ also be a New Dawn-Light of New Era for Daughters of India?
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/2804846842883734
Will always the following story not in context of such Judges and similar others apply?
(i) “Once, a king and fifteen of his soldiers went to a forest for hunting wild animals.
(ii) Suddenly they were surrounded by hundred soldiers from the enemy kingdom with advanced weapons.
(iii) The king knew that it was impossible to defeat them. He took a step backward, turned around and started running away with his soldiers.
(iv) He knew the soldiers would think of him as a coward. He knew they would spread this information and the whole kingdom would talk about it. And his valour would be questioned.
(v) Yet he didn’t care. He kept on running. He wanted to save his life. He had to be there for his family and kingdom. There were going to be serious problems in the future and he wanted to be alive to solve them”. By: Srinath Nalluri, Neutralist- Quora
In what context, the following an article shall apply hereafter, left to readers to Judge and Decide? THANKS
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=A16299_0_1_0_M
Needs Good-Bye to Ethics When Democracy at Stake-Risk in India
http://www.sapulse.com/new_comments.php?id=A16299_0_1_0_M
Forwarded By: Balbir Singh Sooch, Advocate, Ludhiana
First Posted On: March 21, 2020, 12: 57 PM (IST)
http://sikhvicharmanch.com/home.htm
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355
http://www.thekhalsa.org/frame.php?path=356&article=22884
https://www.facebook.com/balbir.singh.355/posts/2805214359513649
Is Ranjan Gogoi Childishly Overestimating Himself as the Judiciary after Becoming Rajya Sabha Member?
..........................................
Comment:- S. Balbir Singh Sooch Ji. You are Right Sir, If not controled gogoi can be made "Law Minister" or Modi will create a New post for him. That will be harmfull for India. Amar Jit Singh Chandi